How to check the authenticity of an email

how to check the authenticity of an email

Apr 16,  · Method 4: Email Checker 1. Pabbly Email Verification. Pabbly Email Verification is a powerful email list cleaner that can verify a long list of 2. EmailVerifier. EmailVerifier is a highly accurate email checker that relies on sophisticated AI algorithms to detect 3. MyEmailVerifier. Oct 18,  · I received an email from the Microsoft Verification Team asking me for my email details. The mail is given below. It was received from the email id- *** Email address is removed for privacy ***. While I did click on the verify link, my internet security redirected me as it seemed like a phishing mail.

So a friend recently told me that they got a verification email from Apple stating that a new email address had been added to their Apple ID. The friend wanted to know whether this was a phishing email or was it legitimate, but sent to them incorrectly by Apple? Well, it ended up being a fake email that was trying to get the user to click on a link so that they would enter their Apple ID credentials. Even though this friend received a phishing email, not all verification emails are fake.

For example, the first time I got this email from Google, I was worried someone was trying to hack into my account. The wording of this email makes it sound like someone created a new email account and somehow linked it to my account. Could they then try to recover my password and get it sent to this new email address?

Luckily for me, it was and the email was harmless. Basically, when someone creates a new Gmail account, they have to add a recovery email address, which sometimes gets mistyped and hence sent to the wrong person.

In any case, you do have to be vigilant before clicking on any link in these types of emails. In order to verify an email as authentic, you have to look at the sending email address and also the email header to be really safe.

The ability to distinguish between a real email and a fake one also depends on your email client. For example, in the above screenshot, you can see that the email was sent from mail-noreply google. This should confirm that the email is really from Google, correct? Well, it depends. How to blow dry bangs straight someone sets up a rogue email server, they can send a fake email that can show the sending address as whatever google.

Even though they can fake this aspect, the rest cannot be faked. So how do you verify that an email is actually being sent from the real source and not someone else? In simple terms, you check the email header. This is also where the email client comes into play. If you are using Gmail, you can verify the source very quickly by simply clicking on the Show Details arrow directly below the name of the sender. The important sections are mailed- bysigned-b y and encryption.

Since it says google. For any email that claims to come from a bank or big company, it should always have the mailed-by and signed-by fields. A visible mailed-by field means that email was SPF-authenticated. A visible signed-by field means the email was DKIM-signed. Lastly, the email will almost always be encrypted if sent from a major bank or company. Even though these fields ensure the email was verified, you need to make sure it was verified by the same company supposedly sending it.

For example, since this email is from Google, it should say google. As you can see, this email is supposedly from ICICI bank, but the email address automatically casts doubt on the authenticity of the email. Instead of anything related to the bank name, the domain is seajin.

Lastly, there is no encryption on the email, which is very shady again. As you can see, the domain is not Microsoft. When verifying emails, always check that the sending email address is from the company you believe it is from, i. Even though the above email is legitimate, the information in the header does not guarantee that the email is safe. You best option here is to make sure the third-party email service is also a large reputable company.

Lastly, if someone is really trying to fake another email address, Google will probably be able to tell and give you a warning like this:. Well, in those cases, you have to view the full email header. For example, Google Outlook view email header to get instructions for that client. Once you do that, you want to search for the following pieces of text under the heading Authentication Results :. The spf line is equivalent to the mailed-by field how can we stop tsunamis Gmail and dkim is equivalent to signed-by.

It should look something like this:. If you want to read more about email authentication in Gmail, check out these links below:.

Lastly, you should make it a habit of going to the browser and manually visiting a website rather than clicking on the link in the email. If there is a link in an email that must be clicked, make sure to check the URL in the address bar of your browser before you enter any login details or other sensitive information. If you have any questions, feel free to comment. Founder of Online Tech Tips and managing editor. He began blogging in and quit his job in to blog full-time.

He has over 15 years of industry experience in IT and holds several technical certifications. Read Aseem's Full Bio. We hate spam too, unsubscribe at any time. Do not share my How to scan an editable document into word Information.


Email Hippo's online,free,email verification tool. Check if email addresses are valid. Verify email addresses and then download results as PDF,CSV. Try for FREE now. Jul 29,  · It depends whether the email is forwarded as an attachment or embedded (quoted). If the email was sent as an attachment it usually isn't altered (although it would still be possible). If the email was forwarded in an embedded/quoted format just as a text there is no way to tell if it was altered or Makeuseof. To check for validity of an email, you can go through several steps in order of complexity/expense: simple syntax check, with regular expression for example: ^ ([a-zA-Z_\-\.]+)@ ([a-zA-Z_\-\.]+)\. ([a-zA-Z] {2,})$. 2. query a smtp server to see if the email exists: Step .

We are all infovores : getting the right information is central to our lives. Getting the right and most accurate information is even of greater importance in this 21st century. Not too long ago, we presented an exhaustive article here on the problem fake news is causing to the world, and how to spot and stop them.

We believe the article found a lot of usefulness with everybody who is concerned with information purity and who wish to see the world returned back to the sane lane as far as information creation and distribution are concerned. But the scope of information corruption is already wider than fake news.

Any information originating from anywhere and targeted at any audience can be corrupted, or even completely false. While a lot of information nowadays comes in the form of news even medical information , a significant portion of them also reaches us as articles, research journals, TV presentations and shows, advertisements in any form, and even as formal education. But the sad truth is that just like news, these other forms of information can also be false and inaccurate.

There is no doubt that the truthfulness of the information we are using at any point in time can determine the outcome of our endeavors. So, first of all, we must know how to verify the authenticity of any information we want to use. Secondly, infovores must know how to choose the best and the most beneficial information out of the millions that have been made available to them.

Information overload is real, and the plentifulness of information now available for all of us is already an impediment to getting the right information in the shortest time.

If the know-how of how to achieve both of these goals are available for all, the world will soon speedily be on the path of information accuracy and truthfulness, through the ease of verification. That is what this article has set out to do.

These are the 10 golden rules of verifying the authenticity of any information in no particular order of importance. Note : We have also included a beautiful infographic on information verification at the end of this article.

Feel free to print and share it, it can improve how you access truths and facts. Furthermore, we have included a beautiful video on 10 rules of information verification, scroll down to the bottom of this article to access it. Why many of us are vulnerable to false information is because we take our information from a single source, or from a very restricted number of sources; we rarely care to have the other side s of a story!

A simple way to have immunity against untrue information is to be a wide reader. If you are well-read, what you already know tends to confirm or refute what you are learning for the first time. It is an inbuilt information verification system! After identifying the right sources for our information, the next best thing for information verification is to read as many different materials on it as possible.

Criticism has its uses and one of them is in information verification. A usual excuse for criticism is an attempt to make what is being criticized better, but criticism may also be used to point out and eject the untrue components of anything, including information. For example, as college students, what we present to our professors during our examinations will undoubtedly be a mixture of true and untrue incorrect information.

The professor will accept what is true and reject what is not after a critical examination of our answers. What the professor did is an example of the critical method of information verification. Behind the creation of every information is a motive; some motives are malicious while others are good. Verifying doubtful information may not need us to go beyond checking the motive behind the creation of that information.

Information can be created for a variety of reasons — profit, politics, and propaganda being some of them. Often, knowing the motive behind any piece of information may point out its true nature before we even digest it. In plainer terms, it is usually good to check if there is no conflict of interest by the author of a piece of information. The sponsor of a piece of information might simply be the creator of the information itself.

Or it might be several individuals, organizations, institutions or bodies. Oftentimes, the reputation of a sponsor of information is enough to classify whatever information that is coming from them as either true or false. Muslim scholars take great pains to know the biography of thousands of different individuals without mixing them up, and this has helped in the verification and authentication of Islamic hadeeths to a very high level.

Expertise and competence often go hand-in-hand with acquiring authority in any field of knowledge. To verify some information, simply checking on the expertise or competence of its creator s can go a long way in establishing the veracity of such information. For example, if multiple similar pieces of information were to be presented side by side, some written by novices and some written by experts, the depth and simplicity with which the experts will present the subject matter is often worlds away from how the novices will present their own.

Personally, I have often used this method in verifying the authenticity of viral social media messages. I often notice messages written by crooks and novices often feature a lot of evasive terms in a bid to avoid tackling knowledge-based aspects of their messages because their creators lack the requisite knowledge , but in the messages of true experts, every aspect of their message is boldly tackled, and they went through it like a breeze, without ambivalence or ambiguity.

In recent times, the internet, and especially LinkedIn has made it possible to check on the level of expertise of most professionals. The interconnection of social media networks and websites has also made it easier to use third party sources to check on the competence and expertise of individuals.

For information sourced from the internet, a cursory check at URLs can be a pointer to whether it is real, genuine information. URL is the string of letters we type into our browser to go to certain sites and pages, many usually end with. This is because the latter URLs are often used more by government parastatals, schools, and organizations while the. This difference may seem minor, but it has a wide implication: government, schools and organization usually have the resources and go to great length to ensure the information on their website are accurate and reliable.

By contrast, individuals and businesses usually using the. Usually, no matter how novel a piece of information is, it will have a similar or related predecessor — Because something cannot be built upon nothing, unless there is a miracle. Checking on extant information regarding a new but doubtful piece of information can establish or disestablish a relationship between them: this is useful in recognizing false connections.

When solid connections between information differing in timeline can be established, it is a pointer to the correctness of such information, especially if the previous information is true. While it is not unusual for info-creators to quote wrong information, putting all their secondary information in quotes makes it easier for verifiers to trace such information down to their source to verify their authenticity while using other methods discussed in this article.

If a piece of information lack quotes, then it must be assumed the entire work is the original work of the creator. However, in these days of widespread plagiarism, especially on the internet, lack of quotes might be among the first signs that a piece of information lack full credibility. Visual elements like pictures, videos and diagrams can be a part of information, or they can be independent information themselves.

However, because they can be visually appreciated, they are widely used to support or reinforce symbolic information. These visual elements can command more attention than symbolic elements in information, and thus, are usually used as a focus in attracting information consumers infovores. Because of this, as they are employed for innocent reasons, they are widely used for mischievous ends too.

It is advisable for verifiers of information authenticity to give equal scrutiny to visual elements of information, just as they will give to the symbolic elements too. Pictures, videos, diagrams, etc can be doctored to deceive! Thanks to the internet, most information that is created and distributed there automatically get time stamps. The date or time any information is released carries a lot of weight in verifying its authenticity and credentials, especially during disputes of plagiarism.

Creators with mischievous intentions can retrieve an old piece of information and give it a more recent timestamp to achieve manipulative ends — This is especially common with fake news. A case in point is the Xenophobic scare in South Africa. During the crisis, a lot of pictures and videos purportedly taken at the scenes of the crisis started circulating on the internet.

But an investigation led by many media houses, among them the BBC, later discovered that much of the gory videos and pictures circulating are from earlier crises, some as old as two years ago!

While the circulating pictures and videos showed scenes of bloodbath and murder orgies, it was later shown that only few lives were lost in the incident. Every infovore should bear it in mind that inauthentic information is not restricted to what we read in newspapers and on the internet; and what we watch on TV and our digital devices, false information also creeps into what we hear from friends and families, general gossip and living room gists! We should be careful to verify every suspicious bit of information we learned through these channels too before carrying them to others.

People who create inauthentic information usually have a motive, which might be political, propagandistic or commercial. All these motives might not be ethical, or might even be dangerous to the good of the society. We should make sure we are not helping them upon their goal by helping them spread inauthentic information around without verifying them.

False information has done a lot of damage to our society: it has ruined families, careers and created a widespread lack of trust and skepticism.

The internet and social media have made information creation and distribution cheap, but it has also made their verification equally cheap too!

All infovores should always remember that the truth is always one, and no matter how a piece of information sounds like the truth, it is upon us to find that single truth. Of course, investigations and verification is the fastest way to do that, and up are ten ways we can do that.

We hope we have tried. Checking the URL might indicate the credibility of the site where the information is found. There are many steps to do this. You can try each step singly or in combination with others. Some of the methods are i. Looking for what motivated the writer of the information you are reading ii.

Examining the information objectively and critically. Getting to know who the sponsor s of the information is or are. Online information are sponsored by commercial, political, educational, religious and other interest groups.

It is also sponsored by individuals. All sponsors of online information have a motivation for doing so. Infovore Secrets Editorial is made up of passionate individuals that are committed to improving your life. B Pharm. We hope you will enjoy your stay here. We believe our lives will be better if we have great memories and fewer clutters. Please follow us as we build a better world together. Your email address will not be published. Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email. Submit Comment. You have probably done a lot to improve your memory. You have taken memory supplements, read several hours a day, quit smoking and drinking, among others, but you have not seen the improvements you expect.

How to check the authenticity of an email: 0 comments

Add a comment

Your email will not be published. Required fields are marked *